Cases 31 - 40 of 667
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Consumers' Research, et al v. Federal Communications Commission, et al
as 22-13315
Petitioner:
CONSUMERS' RESEARCH, CAUSE BASED COMMERCE, INC., EDWARD J. BLUM and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GIBBS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2022cv02083
Plaintiff:
CALVIN GIBBS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 22-60363
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Kersten Conway and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Gibbs v. Bank of America Bank, N.A.
as 22-1344
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors, 100 Drug Raped Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene M. Gibbs
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, United States: Freddie Mac and others
Acker et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00836
Plaintiff:
Acker, Chris Stuckrath, Cory Acker and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Gibbs JR v. Southern Capital Finance Group, LLC
as 2:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
James O. Gibbs JR
Defendant:
Southern Capital Finance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
