Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Miller et al
as 3:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Earl D Miller , 5 Star Commercial, LLC and 5 Star Capital Fund, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
JASON BARRIOS, TERESA BAUDOUR, FELICIA BONSER and others
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Miller
as 1:2015mc00013
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Richard A Miller
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. HEALTH FORMULAS, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00103
Defendant:
BRANDON CHAPNICK, CHAPNICK, SMUKLER & CHAPNICK, INC., DJD DISTRIBUTION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Federal Trade Commission v. Health Formulas LLC et al
as 3:2014mc00032
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Health Formulas LLC, Pure Vitamins LLC, Longhorn Marketing LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
