Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Oracle USA, Inc et al v. Rimini Street, Inc et al
as 3:2011mc00051
Plaintiff:
Oracle USA, Inc , Oracle America, Inc and Oracle International Corporation
Defendant:
Rimini Street, Inc and Seth Ravin
Oracle America Inc et al v. Quin Rudin et al
as 8:2010cv01853
Defendant:
Alethea Group LLC, Certus Group of Companies LLC, Certus Solutions Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Certus Solutions Inc and Quin Rudin
Counter Claimant:
Dearborne Circle LLC and Michael Mai
Plaintiff:
Oracle America Inc and Oracle Credit Corporation
IN RE GOOGLE
as 11-M968
Petitioner:
Adobe Systems, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Respondent:
Eolas Technologies Incorporated
Amicus Curiae:
Microsoft Corporation, Office Depot, Inc. and Perot Systems Corp.
Oracle America, Inc. et al v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 3:2010cv02760
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc. and Joanne Olsen
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
