Cases 31 - 40 of 4,130
Montenegro-Rivera v. Garland
as 24-60149
Petitioner:
Flor De Maria Montenegro-Rivera and Ada Lisbeth Medrano-Montenegro
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Benitez-Rivera v. Garland
as 24-60150
Petitioner:
Carlos Benitez-Rivera
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
United States of America v. Cirino
as 24-714
Defendant:
LUIS CIRINO, ANGEL SALINAS, OMAR RIVERA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner:
ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Maisonet (Negron Sr.)
as 24-572
Defendant:
GUILLERMO NEGRON, SR., FRANCISCO MAISONET, JOSE MAISONET and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Republic of Panama v. Omega Engineering LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21097
Plaintiff:
Republic of Panama
Defendant:
Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. ยง 0185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Franco-De Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1623
Petitioner:
JENIFFER ALEJANDRA FRANCO-DE RIVERA and ANDRE RIVERA-FRANCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Gerinardo Rivera
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GERINARDO RIVERA, a/k/a Gerry
USA v. Efrain Rivera-Matos
as 24-10810
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EFRAIN RIVERA-MATOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
