Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Loriann Anderson, et al v. Service Employees Internationa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35871
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELINDA WILTSE, as individuals and representatives of the respective requested classes, DENNIS RICHEY, LORIANN ANDERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHWEST SENIOR & DISABILITY SERVICES, a local intergovernmental agency, OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75, labor organization, JACKSON COUNTY, political subdivision of the State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff: KERRIN FISCUS
State of Oregon, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-35843
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity and DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, CITY OF PORTLAND, KATE BROWN, Governor and others
DeWalt Productions, Inc., et al v. City of Portland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35806
Defendant / Appellee: MARK KRUGER, STEVEN MARKS, DAVID JACKSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEWALT PRODUCTIONS, INC., DBA Fontaine Bleau and RODNEY DEWALT
City of Portland, Oregon, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-72391
Petitioner: SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION, MT. HOOD CABLE REGULATORY COMMISSION, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner: Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor: Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
Biogenic CO2 Coalition v. EPA, et al
as 19-1185
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: Biogenic CO2 Coalition
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1140
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner: American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor: State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019op45264
Plaintiff: Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL, Logan County Board of Commissioners, OH and others
Defendant: Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Theresa Sackler and others
Petitioner: Town of Swampscott, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019cv02421
Defendant: Theresa Sackler, Mortimer D A Sackler, Rhodes Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff: Baldwin County, AL, Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL and others
Petitioner: Town of Swampscott, MA and Pasco County, FL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner: COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?