Cases 31 - 40 of 481
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 22-35790
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, ECOCHEYENNE, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF MONTANA
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Texas
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant:
Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner:
Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al.
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
State of California et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
