Cases 31 - 40 of 2,198
Vasquez Merida v. Garland
as 24-1347
Petitioner:
DORENA LILY VASQUEZ MERIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez-Calix v. Garland
as 24-1364
Petitioner:
JUNIOR NOEL VASQUEZ-CALIX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
Ujpan Chilel, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1227
Petitioner:
ROBIN UJPAN CHILEL, MILCY USIRIS VASQUEZ DELEON and O. U.V.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1126
Petitioner:
LUCAS SEBASTIAN MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ, JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ RAMIREZ, JULIA TAHOMY VASQUEZ MEJIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Gonzalez-Vazquez
as 24-50139
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Abel Gonzalez-Vazquez, also known as Abel Gonzalez-Vasquez
Lovos-Vasquez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9503
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO LOVOS-VASQUEZ, ROCICELA STEFANY MUNOZ-PEREZ and DIEGO LOVOS-MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Breezy RDZ Enterprises LLC doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo, Alvaro Costilla doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo, Maria Vasquez doing business as Primo Sports Bar doing business as Primo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
United States of America v. Vasquez
as 24-948
Defendant:
JESSIE VASQUEZ and Pelon
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
