Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Orlindo Myles v. W. Montgomery
as 20-15152
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLINDO ANTONIO MYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Carlos Velasco v. W. Montgomery
as 19-56431
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS ELOI VELASCO
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 19-56419
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Anthony Turner v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17440
Defendant / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, Warden at SVSP, SCOTT KERNAN, T. FOSS, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER
Ashley Price v. W. Muniz
as 19-56381
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, S.V.S.P., Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHLEY LUTHER MURRAY PRICE
Zane Hubbard v. Johnson, et al
as 19-17309
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON A. LUERAS, Judge at Sacramento Superior Court, JOHNSON, Psychologist; Correctional Counselor at Salinas Valley State Prison, KEVIN J. MCCORMICK, Judge at Sacramento Superior Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD
G. Walker v. W. Muniz, et al
as 19-17195
Defendant / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, Warden, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary, M. COLVIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
G. DANIEL WALKER
Darren Henderson v. J. Lewis, et al
as 19-16958
Defendant:
KIM KUMAR, B. MARSHALL and W. L. MUNIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. RODRIGUEZ, LVN, L. GAMBOA, M.D., J. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HENDERSON
W. L., IV v. Scott Zirus
as 19-50896
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT ASH JAMES ZIRUS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
W. L., IV, as Next Friend of W.L.,V, a Minor
Manuel Quintero v. W. Muniz
as 19-55826
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL QUINTERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
