Cases 31 - 40 of 200
WATERMAN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., BOB CALDERONI, NANCI CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BAKER v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., REVETA BOWERS, ROBERT CORTI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
DOE v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, PETER P. BUTTIGIEG, BLANE A. WORKIE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Boldrini et al v. Giovannini et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini, Michael J. Pega, Jr. and Daniele A. Boldrini
Defendant:
Joseph P. Giovannini, Mary Pamela Amos, Marianne Cameli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOPKINS v. ROGERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
ROGERS CORPORATION, BRUCE D HOECHNER, KEITH L BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
COGENT INFOTECH CORPORATION v. RUBENSTEIN et al
as 2:2021cv01857
Plaintiff:
COGENT INFOTECH CORPORATION
Defendant:
PETER RUBENSTEIN, NIKTOR, LLC, Nandan Banarjee and others
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC v. WARRICK
as 2:2021cv04862
Plaintiff:
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
PETER WARRICK
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WHITFIELD v. RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04390
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC., GERALD M GORSKI, BONNIE S BIUMI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
