Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,007
In re: Mark Sharp
as 23-12357
Petitioner: In re: MARK EVERETT SHARP
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JS et al v. Vineyard Church et al
as 1:2023cv03689
Petitioner: JS, BS, Jorel Shophar and others
Respondent: Vineyard Church, Belton Wayne Sims, Jason Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Larry Smith
as 23-5519
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LARRY EVERETT SMITH
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff: D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant: Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Everett Miller, Jr.
as 23-5485
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EVERETT EUGENE MILLER, JR.
SHELTON v. TITAN FUNDING PARTNERS LLC
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff: JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant: TITAN FUNDING PARTNERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Victor Silvers
as 23-5427
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: VICTOR EVERETTE SILVERS
USA v. Kelly Everett
as 23-11532
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KELLY EVERETT
SHELTON v. NANDYPROTECTINGFAMILIES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01698
Plaintiff: JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant: NANDYPROTECTINGFAMILIES LLC and ETHOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Everett, et al
as 23-55395
Plaintiff / Appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES EVERETT, AKA Charly Everett
Defendant: FRANK EKEJIJA, PATRICK JEVON JOHNSON, NVC FUND, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?