Cases 31 - 40 of 382
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES v. TOWN OF PENDLETON
as 1:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES
Defendant:
TOWN OF PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LAMARR v. GOSHEN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
KAITLIN LAMARR
Defendant:
GOSHEN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and GOSHEN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a GOSHEN HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FUTCH v. MAKWA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
LeAndra Futch
Defendant:
Makwa, LLC, LDF Holdings, LLC, Melinda Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
