Cases 41 - 50 of 530
Peters v. State of Texas
as 21-40850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin
Rambo v. Lumpkin
as 21-11136
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Douglas Rambo
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cole v. Lumpkin
as 21-11120
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gilmer v. Lumpkin
as 21-40837
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joe Marlin Gilmer
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Chandler v. Lumpkin
as 21-11107
Petitioner / Appellant:
Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 21-40820
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eynel Guzman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schwarzer v. White
as 21-40822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Cliff Schwarzer
Defendant / Appellee:
Travis L. White, Patrick O'Daniels and Bobby Lumpkin
Flores v. Lumpkin
as 21-20579
Petitioner / Appellant:
Fidel Flores
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 21-40809
Petitioner / Appellant:
Johnny Lee Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ford v. Lumpkin
as 21-20575
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lee Ford
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
