Cases 41 - 50 of 126
TALEN ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
TALEN ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC, BRANDON SHORES LLC, H.A. WAGNER LLC and others
Interested Party:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. and UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Ernest Jarrett, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 19-73332
Not Yet Classified:
LAW OFFICE OF JAMES S. TERRELL, JAMES STEPHEN TERRELL, LAW OFFICE OF SHARON J. BRUNNER and others
Petitioner:
ERNEST JARRETT and ERNEST L. JARRETT, P.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ERNEST JARRETT
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-4355
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Anthony Manzi, Bronx Supreme Court Officer, Deputy Inspector Howard Redmond, New York City Police Department (NYPD), Pinny Ringel and others
Defendant:
New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, New York City Police Department and John Doe 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-4354
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Anthony Manzi, Bronx Supreme Court Officer, Deputy Inspector Howard Redmond, New York City Police Department (NYPD), Pinny Ringel and others
Defendant:
New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, New York City Police Department and John Doe 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-4189
Defendant:
Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141, New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, Sergeant Matthew Brunner, Bronx Supreme Court Officer (Shield #478) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Inspector Howard Redmond, New York City Police Department (NYPD), NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Shield No. 6577, NYPD Lieutenant Ralph Nieves and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-3654
Defendant:
Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141, New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, Sergeant Matthew Brunner, Bronx Supreme Court Officer (Shield #478) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Inspector Howard Redmond, New York City Police Department (NYPD), NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Shield No. 6577, NYPD Lieutenant Ralph Nieves and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-3188
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Anthony Manzi, Bronx Supreme Court Officer, Pinny Ringel, Ramon Dominguez, Bronx Supreme Court Officer (Shield #508) and others
Defendant:
New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, New York City Police Department and John Doe 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 19-3169
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Anthony Manzi, Bronx Supreme Court Officer, Pinny Ringel, Ramon Dominguez, Bronx Supreme Court Officer (Shield #508) and others
Defendant:
New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities, New York City Police Department and John Doe 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
