Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 325
State of Alaska, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al
as 21-35035
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Safari Club International, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35030
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2021cv00160
Defendant: DAVID BERNHARDT, AURELIA SKIPWITH, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff: William CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00308
Plaintiff: Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: Chad B. Padgett, Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant: ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS et al v. BERNHARDT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00175
Plaintiff: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant: DAVID BERNHARDT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and SCOTT DE LA VEGA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Cottonwood Environmental Law C v. Steve Bullock, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-36125
Defendant / Appellee: LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Montana, U.S. FOREST SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8072
Intervenor: SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Department of Interior Secretary, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner: STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant: David Bernhardt and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
State of California et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00440
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Conservation Council for Hawaii v. Bernhardt
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant: Wilbur Ross, David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: National Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?