Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Teresa Perkins, et al v. Kenneth Edgar, et al
as 21-55552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TERESA PERKINS, as Successor-in-Interest to Decedent Justin Perkins and DAVID MICHAEL PERKINS
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the CITY OF ANAHEIM Police Department, CASEY MORRISON, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANAHEIM, CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RICKY REYNOSO, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANAHEIM and KENNETH EDGAR, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANAHEIM
Linda Castellucci v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 21-55554
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA CASTELLUCCI, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The People of the State of California v. Credit One Bank, N.A., et al
as 5:2021cv00872
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, Credit One Bank, N.A. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dominique Evans, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55503
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOMINIQUE EVANS, an individual, AKA Dominique Evans-Franks and DARRYL JOHNSON, an individual
Defendant:
DANA ORENT, an individual, CITY OF PASADENA, a municipal entity and DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Defendant / Appellant:
MIKE RODRIGUEZ, an individual, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and MARK LILLIENFIELD, an individual
Dominique Evans, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, an individual and DOMINIQUE EVANS, an individual, AKA Dominique Evans-Franks
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity, MARK LILLIENFIELD, an individual, DANA ORENT, an individual and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1011
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
In re: Fyre Festival Litigatio
as 21-988
Respondent:
Does 1-50, inclusive, William McFarland and Fyre Media, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Petitioner:
Daniel Jung, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Phyllis Bennett, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, et al
as 21-1642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHYLLIS BENNETT, Executor of the Estate of Harvey Bennett
Defendant / Appellee:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC
Defendant:
DOES 1-50, Inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
