Cases 41 - 50 of 158
W. Leighton Lord, III v. South Carolina Electric & Gas
as 20-1346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
W. LEIGHTON LORD, III, in his capacity as chairman and director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority, JESSICA S. COOK, DONNA JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, a/k/a Santee Cooper, an agency of the state of South Carolina
Defendant / Appellant:
SCANA SERVICES, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY and SCANA CORPORATION
South Carolina Electric & Gas v. South Carolina Public Service
as 20-134
Respondent:
CORRIN F. BOWERS, KRISTOFER CLARK, in his capacity as director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority, PEGGY H. PINNELL, in her capacity as director of the South Carolina Public Service Authority and others
Petitioner:
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, SCANA SERVICES, INCORPORATED and SCANA CORPORATION
Noel Thomas v. North Carolina Mutual Ins., et al
as 20-10318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTY SMITH, Consumer Specialist ADOI, Consumer Services, NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE and others
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. Molly Malone's LLC, d/b/a Finn McCools et al
as 1:2019cv03479
Defendant:
Xavier Cereva, WILLIAM A. SPORT, Andrea Gentile and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Scott Finn
as 8:2019cv03083
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
Petitioner:
Scott Finn
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
as 1:2019mc00160
Petitioner:
SCOTT FINN
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
Jeffrey La Bri v. Michael Finn, et al
as 19-2742
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER VAN KIRK, MICHAEL FINN, MARK SANDERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY LA BRI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
