Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Fitzsimmons v. United States Secret Service et al
as 4:2013cv04299
Plaintiff:
Erin Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States Secret Service and United States Department Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06284
Plaintiff:
Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc , Ethicon LLC and others
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Fitzsimmons et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-19457
Plaintiff:
Linda Fitzsimmons and Richard Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Eddie Kessler et al
as 2:2013cv03142
Defendant:
Neale Fitzsimmons, Eddie Kessler and Passion Ristorante Inc
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Coleman v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
as 13-487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dawson Huber Coleman, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Marsha L. Steinhardt and Frank Fitzsimmons, Court Clerk
Coleman v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2012cv05852
Plaintiff:
Dawson Huber Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Court Clerk Frank Fitzsimmons, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and Marsha L. Steinhardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tribune Company v. Tribune Company et al
as 1:2010mc00089
Respondent:
Charter Trust
Defendant:
Fitzsimmons
Debtor:
Tribune Company
Plaintiff:
Tribune Company
FITZSIMMONS v. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:10-CV-61423
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
FITZSIMMONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
