Cases 41 - 50 of 119
The Geo Group, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56172
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION
Stephen Mayer v. T. Johns, et al
as 20-13599
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN MEYER and STEPHEN MAYER
Respondent / Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., T. JOHNS, Facility Manager and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gabriel Aguilar-Hernandez v. GEO Group, et al
as 20-50803
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO Group, Doctor Fajardo, Health Service Administrator, Health Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gabriel Aguilar-Hernandez
Eric Brink v. Patricia Herron, et al
as 20-16697
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTEN HILKEY, Colorado State Board of Parole Chairman, official/individual capacities, PATTY A. WEAVER, individual/official capacity; administrative staff, fugitive operations, extradition unit, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, municipality located in Arizona and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC JAY BRINK
Demoore Gray v. Ryan Russell, et al
as 20-16702
Defendant / Appellee:
CATES, CO IV, unknown officer employed at Arizona Dept. of Corrections "Safford Unit," in her official capacity, HENRY ABULARACH, Mr., UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as 4 unknown Scottsdale Police Officers, in both their official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOORE T. GRAY
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-16690
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Immigrant Legal Resources Cent, et al v. City of McFarland, et al
as 20-16580
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Not Classified By Court:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Ctr., et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 20-16557
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Appellant:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Codner, et al v. Choate, et al
as 20-1265
Plaintiff:
NAOMI LESTHER RAFAEL HERNANDEZ MORALES, ALISON (MELVIN) MENDOZA MENDOZA, BRITANY (JOSE ANTOINIO) RIVIERA CALERO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JOHNNY CHOATE, in his official capacity as warden of the Aurora Contract Detention Facility owned and operated by Geo Group Inc., JOHN FABBRICATORE, in his official capacity as Denver ICE ERO Acting Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NDI WILFRED TEMAH, MADELINE (FLAVIO) TATIS BELLIARD, SANELA HAMZIC and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Center et al v. City of McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv00966
Petitioner:
Immigrant Legal Resources Center and Freedom For Immigrants
Respondent:
City of McFarland and City of McFarland Planning Commission
3Rd Party Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
