Cases 41 - 50 of 496
James Martin v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., et al
as 21-11097
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CHATTEM INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al
as 21-10335
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 630 WELFARE FUND
Richard Sprague v. Sanofi S.A., et al
as 21-10306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SPRAGUE, individually and as representative of the estate of Brenda Sprague and MARILYN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A. and others
Arthur Cartee v. Boehringer Ingelheim, et al
as 21-10305
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR CARTEE
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1055
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1017
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1018
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer v. Cipla Ltd.
as 21-1016
Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Appellee:
CIPLA LTD.
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm
as 20-2926
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
DeCostanzo v. GlaxoSmithKline plc
as 1:2020cv02284
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Plaintiff:
Lori DeCostanzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
