Cases 41 - 50 of 86
ROGERS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as NJ/3:13-cv-03274
Plaintiff:
EUGENIA ROGERS
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. and others
BRAVO DE MENESES v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as FLN/1:13-cv-00092
Plaintiff:
MARIA M DE MENESES
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP , TEVA CANADA LIMITED , COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS and others
DISOSWAY et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-03730
Plaintiff:
LINDA DISOSWAY
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, GENENTECH, INC., ROCHE LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Burch et al v. Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp et al
as SC/6:12-cv-01359
Plaintiff:
Margaret Burch and Leland Burch
Defendant:
Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp , Merck & Co Inc, Glaxosmithkline LLC and others
Curnes v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al
as IAS/4:12-cv-00208
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newton Curnes
Defendant:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. , Roche Laboratories Inc , ROCHE PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Diana Cunningham v. Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp et al
as CAC/8:12-cv-00815
Plaintiff:
Diana Cunningham
Defendant:
Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp , Hoffman-La Roche Inc, Roche Therapeutics Inc and others
Rodin-Novak v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al
as ILN/1:12-cv-03848
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Roche Laboratories, Inc., Genentech Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Rodin-Novak
KNIFFEN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-02150
Plaintiff:
DONNA LEE KNIFFEN and DONALD LEO KNIFFEN
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck & Co., Inc., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC and others
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
as 2:2011cv06546
Defendant:
Genentech Inc.
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Massa v. Genentech, Inc. et al
as 4:2011mc00436
Plaintiff:
Cary Massa
Defendant:
Genentech, Inc. and Xoma (US) LLC
Movant:
Craig Leonardi and Central Dermatology
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
