Cases 41 - 50 of 3,091
Gervat et al v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Polilingua Limited v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv08810
Plaintiff:
Polilingua Limited
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
United States of America v. Gordon
as 24-436
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON BEST GORDON and Brandon Brooks Gordon
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nayeem GordonIn re: Nayeem Gordon
as 24-1152
Petitioner:
In re: NAYEEM GORDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Travers v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Travers
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., Tony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GORDON v. USA
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JEROME GORDON and DARYL JEROME GORDON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Gordon et al v. Cowtown Express Logistics LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09245
Plaintiff:
Niccol Gordon
Defendant:
Cowtown Express Logistics LLC, Carrier 411 Services Inc. and Will Ruddick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
