Cases 41 - 50 of 2,044
COGGINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00250
Petitioner:
HEATHER COGGINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
JAMAL et al v. ALLY FINANCIAL et al
as 2:2024cv00894
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL, ALLY, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AHMED JAMAL and REEM SUQI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lee v. Lee
as 8:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Sherry N. Lee
Defendant:
Heather Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thompson v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
MELODY THOMPSON
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MOON, Officer, as an individual Erroneously Sued As Heather Moon and COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Becker, et al. v. TIG Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW BECKER, LAUREN KUEHNE, ADAM CRISWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIG INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
