Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,567
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00259
Plaintiff: Armer, Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer and others
Defendant: County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
PORT v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
as NJ/3:24-CV-01006
Plaintiff: PORT and HOWARD PORT
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
Petitioner: Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
USA v. Howard-Rios
as 24-10134
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Santiago Parks Howard-Rios
Dearman et al v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00235
Plaintiff: Daniel Howard Dearman and Nicole Annie Dearman
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Howard v. Grierson, et al.
as 24-851
Plaintiff: REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant: STEVEN D. GRIERSON, TERI BERKSHIRE, KRISTEN BROWN and others
Bellin v. Zucker
as 24-341
Plaintiff: ROSALIND BELLIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: M.D. HOWARD A. ZUCKER, J.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Health and ELDERSERVE HEALTH, INC., doing business as RiverSpring at Home
FARRON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: JULIANA FARRON, SHAHAR BAUSI, NOA BAUSI and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
John Alexander, Jr.In re: John Alexander, Jr.
as 24-1093
Petitioner: In re: JOHN ALLEN ALEXANDER, JR.
Respondent: JEFF HOWARD, Warden
USA v. Garner Chestang
as 24-10346
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: GARNER HOWARD CHESTANG
NEWMAN v. VIRITOSE CORP et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Defendant: JERZY GEORGE DREAN, VIRITOSE CORP, GEORGE DREAN and others
Plaintiff: HOWARD A NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?