Cases 41 - 50 of 295
Daniel Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 21-13760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. DRAGASH
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STEPHEN M. WALKER, CHARLES E. ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
John Florendo, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 21-16461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN G. FLORENDO and DEBORAH P. FLORENDO
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, as trustee for the holders of Sami II trust2006-AR7, mortgage pass-through certificates, series 2006-AR7, FKA Bank of New York
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 8:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dragash
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant., Gray Robinson, P.A., United States Attorney Office for the Middle District of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Edward Bloom v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 21-2348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD BLOOM
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, CHASE MORTGAGE HOLDINGS INC, CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
