Cases 41 - 50 of 510
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ABRAMSON v. THE ADVISORY GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01581
Defendant:
JEFF KHATIB, THE ADVISORY GROUP, LLC and THE ADVISORY GROUP, LLC doing business as TAX ADVISORY GROUP doing business as TAX LAW ADVOCATES doing business as TAX LAW ADVISORY
Plaintiff:
STEWART ABRAMSON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
LANE v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00234
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC and RATCHFORD LAW GROUP, P.C.
Plaintiff:
THOMASINA EVETTE LANE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv05790
Defendant:
SHANNON G ZABEL, NANCY A KAMMERDEINER, PAULA WEISS and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Aigeldinger v. Unifund CCR, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01991
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Aigeldinger
Defendant:
Unifund CCR, LLC, Demetrious H Tsaroushis and Tsarouhis Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RISTINE v. TD BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv05446
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. and TD BANK USA, N.A.
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE LYNN RISTINE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC et al v. KATZ et al
as 2:2019mc00170
Respondent:
SHARON KATZ, FOLKMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C. and SHARON BUCHHOLZ
Petitioner:
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC and HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
