Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NCAA v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-71522
:
In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDWARD C. O'BANNON, Jr., BRYON BISHOP and others
Khan et al v. Bristol-Myers Company et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03573
Plaintiff:
Sher Khan , James Aldridge , Charisse M. Aldridge and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Company and McKesson Corporation
Anderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-12930
Plaintiff:
Naomi Anderson and Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Anderson v. ADP Screening and Selecton Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
ADP Screening and Selecton Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Russell Anderson
as 12-10432
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUSSELL MICHAEL ANDERSON, AKA Jamal Anderson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Michael Anderson
as 12-2626
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
HOSTETLER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02199
Plaintiff:
JEFF HOSTETLER , VICKY HOSTETLER , KARL MECKLENBURG and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
