Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 631
In re: Dakota Davis
as 22-1203
Petitioner: In re: DAKOTA REESE DAVIS
In re: Dakota Davis
as 22-1201
Petitioner: In re: DAKOTA REESE DAVIS
Reese v. Garland
as 22-60111
Petitioner: Leaphiny Reese and Thou Samphear
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Gottfried v. Ready Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00585
Plaintiff: Adam Gottfried
Defendant: Ready Capital Corporation, Thomas Edward Capasse, Jack Jay Ross and others
Jacqueline Ostrander, et al v. Heights of Summerlin, LLC, et al
as 21-17068
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACQUELINE OSTRANDER, individually, and as Special Administrator, Personal Representative, and statutory heir to the Estate of SALLY LOU SCANLON and DENISE PAULEY, individually, and as statutory heir to the Estate of SALLY LOU SCANLON
Defendant / Appellant: HEIGHTS OF SUMMERLIN, LLC, SUMMIT CARE, LLC, LATOYA DAVIS and others
Kashif Shankle, et al v. Heights of Summerlin, LLC, et al
as 21-17066
Plaintiff / Appellee: KASHIF SHANKLE, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Rita Esparza, ALFRED ESPARZA, as Statutory Heir to Rita Esparza, LEONARD ESPARZA, as Statutory Heir to Rita Esparza and others
Defendant / Appellant: HEIGHTS OF SUMMERLIN, LLC, SUMMIT CARE, LLC, GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as OR/3:21-CV-01760
Plaintiff: Lyle and Reese Lyle
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Fields v. Brown
as 21-40818
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Fields, Vickie Grant, Jessica Matlock and others
Defendant / Appellee: Tommy Brown, Micah Fenton, Felicia Alexander and others
Waseem Daker v. Therese Barnes, et al
as 21-13801
Plaintiff / Appellant: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee: THERESE S. BARNES, HAROLD D. MELTON, DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS and others
Mark Reese v. Union Supply Group, et al
as 21-13520
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK REESE
Defendant / Appellee: UNION SUPPLY GROUP and UNION SUPPLY DIRECT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?