Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 631
US v. Dakota Davis
as 22-4174
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAKOTA REESE DAVIS
Terry Reese, Sr. v. Virginia International Terminals, LLC
as 22-1275
Petitioner: TERRY D. REESE, SR.
Respondent: VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, LLC, SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, CP&O, LLC and others
US v. Daniel Russell
as 22-4156
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL REESE RUSSELL
In re: Dakota Davis
as 22-1203
Petitioner: In re: DAKOTA REESE DAVIS
In re: Dakota Davis
as 22-1201
Petitioner: In re: DAKOTA REESE DAVIS
Reese v. Garland
as 22-60111
Petitioner: Leaphiny Reese and Thou Samphear
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Kashif Shankle, et al v. Heights of Summerlin, LLC, et al
as 21-17066
Plaintiff / Appellee: KASHIF SHANKLE, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Rita Esparza, ALFRED ESPARZA, as Statutory Heir to Rita Esparza, LEONARD ESPARZA, as Statutory Heir to Rita Esparza and others
Defendant / Appellant: HEIGHTS OF SUMMERLIN, LLC, SUMMIT CARE, LLC, GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Jacqueline Ostrander, et al v. Heights of Summerlin, LLC, et al
as 21-17068
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACQUELINE OSTRANDER, individually, and as Special Administrator, Personal Representative, and statutory heir to the Estate of SALLY LOU SCANLON and DENISE PAULEY, individually, and as statutory heir to the Estate of SALLY LOU SCANLON
Defendant / Appellant: HEIGHTS OF SUMMERLIN, LLC, SUMMIT CARE, LLC, LATOYA DAVIS and others
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as OR/3:21-CV-01760
Plaintiff: Lyle and Reese Lyle
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Fields v. Brown
as 21-40818
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Fields, Vickie Grant, Jessica Matlock and others
Defendant / Appellee: Tommy Brown, Micah Fenton, Felicia Alexander and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?