Cases 51 - 60 of 174
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv02146
Defendant:
SCOTT A. LOVE, CLAYTON A. CLARK, HUTSON LAW FIRM, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Haga, CLARA REDMOND, TAMMY ALVARADO and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Chunara v. RS Clark and Associates Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01072
Defendant:
RS Clark and Associates Inc and City Limits Apartments
Plaintiff:
Ameen Chunara
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv01536
Defendant:
Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., Coty, Inc., Parfums DCoeur, Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Gagnon
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Clark v. Whitestone REIT et al
as 4:2019cv01379
Defendant:
Whitestone REIT, James C Mastandrea and David K Holeman
Plaintiff:
Brian Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kaplan v. Holmes et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Ganesh B Rao, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
In re MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
as 3:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Pamela H Patsley, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Khon Meng Chew
In Re:
MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
Sanders v. RS Clark and Associates, Inc., et al
as 6:2018cv00645
Plaintiff:
Jann Sanders
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and RS Clark and Associates, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lowinger v. Stewart Information Services Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv02203
Defendant:
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Clifford Press, James Chadwick and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lowinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
