Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Bey v. Arlington Texas City of et al
as 5:2012cv00911
Defendant:
Arlington Texas City of, Arlington Texas Police Department, Officer Deary and others
Plaintiff:
Noble T Hasaan Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genoveva Ocampo Cataldi Loza S, et al v. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivi, et al
as 12-14171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENOVEVA MARIA LUISA OCAMPO CATALDI LOZA SANTIVANEZ, an individual and MARCEL FRANCISCO LEON OCAMPO CATALDI LOZA SANTIVANEZ, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA, f.k.a. La Republica de Bolivia, PRESIDENCIA DEL ESTADO PLURINACIONAL, f.k.a. Presidencia de La Republica de Bolivia, VICEPRESIDENCIA DEL ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA, f.k.a. Vicepresidencia de La Republica de Bolivia and others
USA v. Jose Loza-Tabarez
as 12-50003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE JESUS LOZA-TABAREZ, AKA Jose Jesus Tabares, AKA Jose Hernandez Torres
Cheeks of North America, Inc. v. Fort Myer Construction Corp., et al
as 11-7117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cheeks of North America, Inc., CNA
Defendant - Appellee:
Fort Myer Construction Corporation, Francisco Rodrigues Neto, Jose Rodrigues and others
Jose Aguas-Loza, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71733
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE AGUAS-LOZA and MARTHA MARTINEZ-CONTRERAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Reynaldo Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71713
Petitioner:
REYNALDO LOPEZ, AKA Augustin Loza, AKA Augustine Loza, AKA Augustine Martinez, AKA Esparza Lopez Reynaldo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Loza v. Parnon Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04155
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Loza
Defendant:
Parnon Energy Inc., Arcadia Petroleum Ltd., Arcadia Energy (Suisse) SA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
USA v. Armando Loza-Gracia
as 11-40409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARMANDO LOZA-GRACIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
