Cases 51 - 60 of 6,150
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Gulkarov
as 24-1799
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 3, ALBERT ARONOV, ROLANDO CHUMACEIRO and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv05650
Defendant:
Georgia Nut Company
Plaintiff:
Alexander Pea
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Borja-Cuji v. Garland
as 24-1774
Petitioner:
KARLA TATIANA BORJA-CUJI and ANTONY ALEXANDER MARCA-BORJA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ross v. Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC
as 2:2024cv11717
Defendant:
Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Smirnov
as 24-4040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. SMK Pharmacy, Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv04627
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company and others
Defendant:
S & K Warbasse Pharmacy Inc. d/b/a Warbasse Pharmacy, SMK Pharmacy, Corp. d/b/a Natures First Long Term Care & Compounding, Jacqueline Mitsel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-cv-00869
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Dixon, Robert Alexander, Kevin Alexander and others
United States of America v. Gulkarov (Khaimov)
as 24-1730
Defendant:
PETER KHAIMOV, ALEXANDER GULKAROV, ROMAN ISRAILOV and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
