Cases 51 - 60 of 70
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Amor
as 5:2011cv01338
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Armando Amor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amor Garcia et al v. Mena et al
as 1:2011cv03859
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Amor Garcia and Ocean Creek International, LLC
Defendant:
Ernesto Colman Mena, Javier Artega, Dylan Jeannotte and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Amor
as 5:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Armando Amor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abril v. Medina et al
as 1:2011cv20555
Plaintiff:
Norman Abril
Defendant:
Manuel Medina, Joseph Wright, Marvin Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
In re: Dante Morri
as 10-3954
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: DANTE AMOR MORRIS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
EDUARDO C ROBRENO
USA v. Dante Morri
as 10-3841
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: DANTE AMOR MORRIS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Restaurant Development Corp. of La., L.L.C. et al v. Standard Building Company, Inc. of Georgia
as 3:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Restaurant Development Corp. of La., L.L.C., Al Copeland Investments, Inc., CCB of Bossier City, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Standard Building Company, Inc. of Georgia
Restaurant Development Corp. of Louisiana, L.L.C. et al v. Standard Building Company, Inc. of Georgia
as 1:2010mi00108
Plaintiff:
Restaurant Development Corp. of Louisiana, L.L.C., Al Copeland Investments, Inc., CCB of Bossier City, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Standard Building Company, Inc. of Georgia
In Re: Dante Morri
as 10-1618
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: DANTE AMOR MORRIS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
EDUARDO C ROBRENO
USA v. Dante Morri
as 10-1296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANTE AMOR MORRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
