Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35404
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOWER, Assistant Administrator at ODOC, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General at ODOC, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35405
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND BEAMER, Dr., ROBERT WHITE, RN, TLC COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Michael Lujan v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35403
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden, COLLETTE PETERS, MONTOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
Joe W. May v. KushCo Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Christopher Tedford, KushCo Holdings, Inc., Nicholas Kovacevich and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. May
Petitioner:
Gower Golding, Mun Fye Chang, Richard Diamond and others
Donald Gosney v. Mike Gower, et al
as 19-35291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ALLEN GOSNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND BEAMER, Dr., ODOC, TIM KELLY, Dr., ODOC, DANIEL DEWSNUP, Dr., ODOC and others
Nicky Chavez v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35244
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK SERRANO, MARK NOOTH, J. PARKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICKY CHAVEZ
Matthew Daniels v. Casey Cleaver, et al
as 19-35231
Defendant / Appellee:
CASEY CLEAVER, RHONDA GORE, STEPHEN COOK and others
Defendant:
TAMMY GREINER, C. CLEMENTS, COLLETTE PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN DANIELS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gaynor et al v. Sherb
as 1:2018mc00188
Defendant:
Steven J Sherb
Miscellaneou:
Deloy Miller, Marceau N Schlumberger, David M Hall and others
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
