Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 92
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
Service Employees Internationa v. Trump We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4143
Plaintiff / Appellant: Service Employees International Union Local 200 United and Service Employees International Union
Defendant / Appellee: United States Office of Personnel Management, Dale Cabaniss, Director of the Office of Personnel Management and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America
Murphy Company, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-35921
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MURPHY TIMBER INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and MURPHY COMPANY, an Oregon corporation
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
In re: Donald Trump
as 19-8005
Not Yet Classified: In re: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
Lane v. Department of Justice
as 19-2276
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), Executive Office of the President of the United States of America and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16336
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Amicus Curiae: ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FEDERAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE, DUANE MORELY COX, TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16299
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SABINE DURDEN, DON ROSENBERG, BRIAN McCANN, JUDY ZEITO, MAUREEN MULRONEY, MAUREEN LAQUERRE, DENNIS BIXBY, Angel Families, DUANE MORELY COX and others
John Demos, Jr. v. United States Washington D.C., et al
as 19-5158
Defendant / Appellee: United States Washington D.C., United States Attorney General, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Robert Demos, Jr.
Alharbi v. Miller
as 19-1570
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sabah Murshed, Radwan Ali, Farah Mohamed and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Pompeo, Secretary of United States Department of State, United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?