Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 713
City of Portsmouth v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45042
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Portsmouth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Belmont County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45034
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Belmont County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scioto County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45038
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Scioto County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ross County Board of County Commissioners v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45040
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Ross County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ashland County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45012
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Ashland County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pike County Board of County Commissioners v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45039
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Pike County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harlan County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45027
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Harlan County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Ins., et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 22-80116
Not Classified By Court: In re: HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND, PETER STALEY and others
Petitioner: GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., GILEAD HOLDINGS, LLC, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant: Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05822
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation, Hy-Vee, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?