Cases 51 - 60 of 778
Clark et al v. Stockton et al
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jason Clark, Jenifer Clark, Kai Gilbert and others
Defendant:
James Stockton, Stockton & Associates INC, Stockton Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Crawford v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04877
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crawford
Defendant:
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., William L. Ashton, Brittany K. Bradrick and others
Desai v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04808
Plaintiff:
Rilesh Desai
Defendant:
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., William L. Ashton, Brittany K. Bradrick and others
Erie County Employees' Retirement System v. Cutera, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Erie County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc., David H. Mowry, Rohan Seth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Ober v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03378
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ober
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, David R. Epstein and others
Wang v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
Boyd v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Janet Boyd
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, David R. Epstein and others
In re Seagen, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2023cv03254
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sandra Ober, Elaine Wang and Janet Boyd
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Van Dorn v. Wu et al
as 2:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Seth Van Dorn
Defendant:
Eric Wu, John Rice, Jonathan Jaffe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
