Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Hill v. The Wake County Administration et al
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
The Wake County Administration, Raleigh City Administration to Wake County, Jesus M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenberg v. Browning et al
as 4:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
E. F. Greenberg
Defendant:
Michael G. Browning, Lynn J. Good, Daniel R. DiMicco and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
COVINGTON et al v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LITTLE COVINGTON , HERMAN BENTHLE LEWIS, JR. , VIOLA RYALS FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT A. RUCHO, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. COOKE et al
as 1:2015mc00018
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
A. WAYLAND COOKE and H. DAVIS NORTH, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. PARDUE
as 1:2015mc00011
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
JAMES H. PARDUE
LI V. SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00373
Defendant:
SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC., DOUGLAS H. BOWERS, SUSAN G. CASEY and others
Plaintiff:
KUEI JUNG LI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LAKOWITZ v. SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv00371
Defendant:
SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC., DOUGLAS H. BOWERS, SUSAN G. CASEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Miller v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2015mc00032
Plaintiff:
David H. Miller
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Hummingbird Credit Counseling And Education, Inc. v. Holder, Jr.
as 5:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Hummingbird Credit Counseling And Education, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bell v. USHBB, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
USHBB, Inc., James A. Moore, Oscar H. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
