Cases 61 - 70 of 691
LARSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01290
Petitioner:
KEITH A. LARSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GreneCo LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
GreneCo LLC, Gene D Larson, Gregory K Womack and others
Monteleone v. View, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00980
Nominal Defendant:
View, Inc. and CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II
Plaintiff:
James Monteleone
Defendant:
Rao Mulpuri, Vidul Prakash, Toby Cosgrove and others
Daniels v. Novant Health Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr. and Clarence Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Novant Health Inc, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, The, Mecklenburg EMS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Larson v. Midlothian Hog Wild, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv50241
Plaintiff:
Jenna Larson
Defendant:
Midlothian Hog Wild, Inc. and Bryan Pikorz
USA v. Lee Larson
as 22-12031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEE RODGER LARSON
Tara Lasham v. Jason Grimes, et al
as 22-15768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARA LASHAM, Co-Trustee, Kingdom of Heaven Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON GRIMES, GERALD W. SCATENA, BRUCE LARSON and others
Larson v. Kohl's, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02691
Plaintiff:
Allen Larson
Defendant:
Kohl's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DOH Oil Company et al v. Kahle et al
as 7:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
DOH Oil Company and Craig A. Johnson
Defendant:
Aaron Kahle, Steve Kerrigan, Stephen Yerkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lasham v. Grimes et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tara Lasham
Defendant:
Jason Grimes, Gerald W. Scatena, Bruce Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
