Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Doris Cardoza-Fuentes v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73730
Petitioner:
DORIS CARDOZA-FUENTES, AKA Doris Fuentes-Cardoza
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Arcadio Garcia-Cardoza
as 12-41170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARCADIO GARCIA-CARDOZA, also known as Rene Garcia-Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
George Peabody v. Joseph Cardoza, et al
as 12-16512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE PEABODY, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH E. CARDOZA, DAVID M. LOUIE and WILLIAM J. WYNHOFF
USA v. Jared Cardoza
as 12-3051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Jared Cardoza
Maria Cardoza Alcocer, et al v. US Attorney General
as 12-13480
Petitioner:
MARIA TERESA CARDOZA ALCOCER, SIMITRIO RAMIREZ VILLALBA and FRANSCISCO J. TORRES CARDOZA
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Pagan (Lagares)
as 12-2447
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilson Pagan, AKA King Gunz, Pedro Herrera, AKA King Aventura, Rogelio Ramos, AKA King Bogelio and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kelvin Lagares, AKA King Haze
United States of America v. Robles (Mendoza)
as 12-2288
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Javier Robles, Derrilyn Needham, Joey Figueroa and others
Defendant - Appellant:
William Mendoza
Peabody v. Cardoza et al
as 1:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
George Peabody
Defendant:
Joseph E. Cardoza, David M. Louie and William J. Wynhoff
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Pagan (Velez)
as 12-1437
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilson Pagan, AKA King Gunz, Pedro Herrera, AKA King Aventura, Rogelio Ramos, AKA King Bogelio and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Noel Velez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
