Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Kam et al v. Dallas County et al
as 1:2018mc00584
Defendant:
Dallas County, John B Peyton, Jr and State of Texas
Petitioner:
Probate Judge Guy Herman
Plaintiff:
Carol M Kam
Respondent:
Carol M Kam
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Dallas County, Alabama v. Actavis, LLC et al
as 1:2018op45667
Plaintiff:
Dallas County, Alabama
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dallas County, Alabama v. Actavis, LLC et al
as ALS/2:18-cv-00225
Plaintiff:
Dallas County, Alabama
Defendant:
Actavis, LLC , Actavis Pharma, Inc. , Allergan PLC and others
Dallas County, Alabama v. Actavis, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dallas County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adair County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as IAS/4:18-cv-00011
Plaintiff:
Adair County , Adams County , Audubon County and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP , Purdue Pharma Inc , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Claiborne Y v. Baxter L et al
as 3:2017cv02847
Plaintiff:
Shanta Claiborne Y
Defendant:
Robert Baxter L, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Estrada v Dallas County, Texas et al
as 7:2015mc00813
Plaintiff:
Juan Alberto Estrada
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas and State of Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Johnson v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as ALS/2:15-cv-00088
Plaintiff:
Carrie Johnson
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care - Dallas County , Rafael Lopez, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
