Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Amber Lanphere, et al v. Chad Wright, et al
as 09-36035
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMBER LANPHERE, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated and PAUL M. MATHESON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CHAD WRIGHT, Puyallup Tribe Tax Department, Enforcement Officer and PUYALLUP TRIBE, a recognized American Indian Tribe
Sandra Harrilal, et al v. Steve Magner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sandra Harrilal and Steven R. Johnson, doing business as Market Group and Properties
Plaintiff: Bee Vue and Lamena Vue
Defendant - Appellee: Steve Magner, individually and as a supervisor of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, Michael Kalis, individually and as a code enforcement officer of City of St. Paul, Dick Lippert, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul and others
Frank Steinhauser, III, et al v. City of St. Paul, etc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frank J. Steinhauser, III, Mark E. Meysembourg and Kelly G. Brisson
Defendant - Appellee: City of St. Paul, a municipal corporation, Randy Kelly, individually and as Mayor of City of St. Paul, Andy Dawkins, individually and as Director of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement and others
Thomas J. Gallagher, et al v. Steve Magner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant: Thomas J. Gallagher, Joseph J. Collins, Sr., Dadder's Properties, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: Steve Magner, individually and as a supervisor of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, Mike Cassidy, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul, Joel Essling, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul and others
KRR, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2008cv03534
Plaintiff: KRR, INC. and DAVID C. BROOKS, ESQUIRE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ENCARNACION LOUKATOS, PHILADELPHIA MULTIFAMILY HUB OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
John Hamilton v. City East Chicago IN, et al
as 08-2214
Defendant: EAST CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, GEORGE PABEY, Mayor, A. WEST, Law Enforcement Officer and others
Plaintiff: JOHN P. HAMILTON
Bejarano v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv22802
Plaintiff: Raul Bejarano
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security-Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bamberg v. Simmons et al
as 1:2007cv04313
Plaintiff: Reynard Bamberg
Defendant: Carolyn L. Simmons, Verna Eggleston, James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMS V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-5040
Amicus Curiae: Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association and Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association
Plaintiff-Appellant: James J. Aaron, et al., James J. Aaron, et al. and James J. Aaron, et al.
Defendant-Appellee: United States, United States and United States
ADAMS V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-5012
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION and NEW ENGLAND LEGAL FOUNDATION
Plaintiff-Appellant: STEPHEN S. ADAMS and 14,302 other similarly situated plainti
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?