Cases 61 - 70 of 423
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sims v. Memorial Hermann Health System et al
as 4:2021cv04225
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sims
Defendant:
Memorial Hermann Health System and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lancaster et al v. Murray et al
as 4:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Lancaster and Carol D. Lancaster
Defendant:
Nathan A. Murray, Stayko Dimitrov Staykov, Bradley Ward Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clapper et al v. American Realty Investors Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02970
Plaintiff:
David M Clapper, Atlantic Midwest LLC and Atlantic XIII LLC
Defendant:
American Realty Investors Inc, American Realty Trust Inc, Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc and others
Respondent:
Syntek Acquisition Corp.
Petitioner:
Swalm & Associates
Interested Party:
Farmer Fuqua & Huff PC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Callier v. Rapture Reel, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Rapture Reel, Inc and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Reece v. Lumbreras et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Defendant:
Bert Lumbreras, Chris Marroquin, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Callier v. Bitty Advance 2, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Bitty Advance 2, LLC., MCA Servicing, LLC., Craig Hecker and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
