Cases 61 - 70 of 8,978
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation and The O'Neil Group Company, LLC
Defendant:
Aniza Brown, Rosie Project and Jane and John Does 1-50
Morrow v. Genius Fund, et al.
as 24-2306
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MORROW
Defendant:
GENIUS FUND, LIAM PALMIERI, CHRIS FINELLI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wanjuan Media (Tianjin) Co. LTD v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-899
Plaintiff:
WANJUAN MEDIA (TIANJIN) CO. LTD and Pilot Film And Television Media (Tianjin) Co., LTD.
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Accardi v. County of Suffolk
as 24-903
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ACCARDI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lieutenant ANDREW MANFREDONIA and others
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Ezekwo v. St. Philip Neri
as 24-892
Plaintiff:
Dr. IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
ST. PHILIP NERI CATHOLIC CHURCH, Bronx, New York, RICHARD COPPOLA, Esq., Rev. Msgr JOSEPH P. LAMORTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
