Cases 61 - 70 of 122
In re: Terry Scott
as 13-13295
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY L. SCOTT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Jason Scott
as 13-2930
Petitioner:
In re: JASON L. SCOTT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Scott et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13445
Plaintiff:
Goldie M. Scott and Darel L. Scott, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
In re: LA Workout, Inc.
as 2:2013mc00152
Defendant:
James E Brewer, LA Workout - SFV LLC, LA Workout Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Ma and Par Excellence Inc and Robert L Scott
In Re Debtor:
LA Workout Inc
Rubin v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00212
Movant:
Leonid Farbman
Defendant:
Joseph Kenneth Keller, Brett L. Scott, Rajesh C. Shrotriya and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Rubin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Skene v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00175
Defendant:
Joseph Kenneth Keller, Brett L Scott, Rajesh C. Shrotriya and others
Plaintiff:
William P Skene
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Santi v. Spectrum Pharmacauticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00502
Defendant:
Joseph Kenneth Keller, Brett L. Scott, Rajesh C. Shrotriya and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Santi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Carroll v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Junqian Carroll
Defendant:
Joseph Kenneth Keller, Brett L Scott, Rajesh C Shrotriya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Paramjeet Malhotra, et al v. Robert Steinberg, et al
as 13-35219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PARAMJEET S MALHOTRA and SUNITA MALHOTRA, a marital community
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT D. STEINBERG and STEINBERG & ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
JAMES W GRACE, DAVID RINNING, JOHN L. SCOTT, INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
