Cases 61 - 70 of 324
ZAYNUTDINOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv05596
Plaintiff:
AZAMJON ZAYNUTDINOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JEH JOHNSON and LEON RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Hakaj v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv08101
Plaintiff:
Valmira Hakaj
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and Phyllis A. Coven
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05743
Plaintiff:
Quan Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lopez v. Richardson et al
as 1:2016cv09670
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Gregory A. Richardson, David Roark, Malethea Holmes-Okeawolman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 16-41411
Movant - Appellant:
RHONDA ANN FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Singh v. Baran et al.
as 1:2016cv07994
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Kathy Baran and Leon Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Satwant Singh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Malas v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv09655
Plaintiff:
Radwan Malas
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Leon Rodriguez , Kenneth Madsen and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Urban Equality Now v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
Urban Equality Now
Defendant:
Leon Rodriguez and Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PAYEN v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2016cv05276
Plaintiff:
VILDROPHE PIERRE PAYEN
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ZHENG v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05251
Plaintiff:
DAMI ZHENG
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
