Cases 61 - 70 of 1,587
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Taylor Freezer Sales Co. of Georgia, Inc., ex rel. et al v. McDonald's Corp.
as 2:2023mi00005
Plaintiff:
Taylor Freezer Sales Co. of Georgia, Inc., ex rel. and Kytch, Inc.
Defendant:
McDonald's Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Floyd v. Quotient Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Quotient Technology, Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
McDonald et al v. RPM Motorsports, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Ryan Patrick McDonald and Amanda Beth Lewis
Defendant:
RPM Motorsports, LLC and United Auto Credit Corporation
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Wang v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Lorraine Hariton and others
O'Dell v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Nathan Smith and Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Jody Gessow and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Andrew Gessow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Dickson v. Janvey
as 23-10726
Appellant:
Hugh Dickson and Mark McDonald
Appellee:
Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as the Court-appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, Official Stanford Investors Committee and Societe Generale Private Banking (Suisse) S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
