Cases 61 - 70 of 71
United States v. Fidel Quintana
as 09-2749
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Fidel Diaz Quintana, also known as Miguel Joe Martinez, also known as Miguel Martinez-Gonzales, also known as Saul Rojo-Flores
Miguel Bravo-Martinez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72330
Petitioner:
MIGUEL BRAVO-MARTINEZ and TERESA CARRILLO-MEDINA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Miguel Mendiola-Martinez
as 09-50242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL MENDIOLA-MARTINEZ
Damian Carrillo Obregon v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
Antonio Castillo Acosta, Franklin Duarte Aguilar, Agustin Castillo Aguirre and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Jesus Miguel Martel-Martinez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73933
Petitioner:
JESUS MIGUEL MARTEL-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Miguel Martinez Perez v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-72482
Petitioner:
MIGUEL DARIO MARTINEZ PEREZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
USA v. Hector Tapia-Martinez
as 08-10243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HECTOR MIGUEL TAPIA-MARTINEZ
Miguel Martinez Marroquin v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71327
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL MARTINEZ MARROQUIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Mondragon-Nieto
as 07-20257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGAR MONDRAGON-NIETO, also known as Michael Martinez, also known as Jose Orozco, also known as Edgar Nieto Mondragon, also known as Michael Stephen Gonzales, also known as Edgar N Mondragon, also known as Miguel Angelo Martinez, also known as Michael Ang
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
