Cases 71 - 80 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LAWRENCE v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv02106
Defendant:
JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN, DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HENNEN v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01948
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER HENNEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
DUNCAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014mc00104
Respondent:
GREGORY BALLARD, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Petitioner:
JACKY DUNCAN
JINDAL v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv01651
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
KUMUD JINDAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Wolberg v. Koy et al
as 2:2014mc00084
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wolberg
Defendant:
Kevin Koy , Daniel Stamer, Indiana Auction Ventures II LLC and others
TARAPARA v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01618
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
BABULAL TARAPARA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Patton et al v. Deucher et al
as 2:2014cv00360
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patton and Cathryn Patton
Defendant:
Chad Deucher, Rick Clatfelter and Marquis Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BANES v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv01599
Plaintiff:
DAVID BANES
Defendant:
DANIEL FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN MODANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIMONE
as 1:2014mc00081
Respondent:
DANIEL SIMONE
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
