Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 278
R.J., et al. v. Pfizer Inc., et al.
as MOE/4:15-cv-00153
Plaintiff: R.J., a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, DANIELLE BROWN , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M., a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, YADIRA GALVAN and others
Defendant: PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Laughlin Corp. et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as IAS/1:14-cv-00045
Plaintiff: Laughlin Corp. and T&W AG, Inc.
Defendant: SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC. and SYNGENTA AG
O'Laughlin v. Max Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
as 3:2014mc00093
Plaintiff: Mike O'Laughlin
Defendant: Max Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Garnishee: First Clover Leaf Bank
Colson et al v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01986
Plaintiff: Edward Colson and Jennifer Laughlin
Defendant: Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc. and Matthew Sutton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LAUGHLIN v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01158
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. LAUGHLIN
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02577
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Homer Laughlin China Company et al v. Housewares International Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05875
Plaintiff: HLC Holding, Inc. and The Homer Laughlin China Company
Defendant: Housewares International Inc. and John Doe
Lawrence Roedel v. Vance Laughlin
as 14-72154
Petitioner: LAWRENCE ROEDEL
Respondent: VANCE LAUGHLIN
Laughlin v. Shoop et al
as MD/8:14-cv-01645
Plaintiff: Anna Laughlin
Defendant: Brett Shoop , Mid Atlantic Medical, LLC , BIOMET, Inc. and others
Rashelle Wilms v. Tom Laughlin et al
as 2:2014cv00337
Defendant: Billy Jacks Moral Revolution Partnership, Christine Laughlin, Frank Laughlin and others
Plaintiff: Rashelle Wilms

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?