Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Randy Soderstrom v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72110
:
In re: RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
TONY RACKAUCKAS, District Attorney, SHADDI KAMIABIPOUR, Deputy District Attorney, BOB MCDONELL, Chief of Police and others
Randy Soderstrom v. USDC-CAC
as 09-71546
:
In re: RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
United States v. Randy Vanhorn
as 09-1815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Randy Lee Vanhorn
United States v. Randy Vanhorn
as 09-1183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Randy Lee Vanhorn
Randy Lee Soderstrom v. Henry T Nicholas et al
as 8:2008cv01099
Defendant:
David Dull, Broadcom Corporation, William J Ruehle and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Soderstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Soderstrom v. Samueli et al
as 5:2008cv05310
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Soderstrom
Defendant:
Henry T Nicholas, III, Henry Samueli, William J. Ruehle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Randy Soderstrom v. Henry Nicholas, III, et al
as 08-56847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Defendant:
HENRY T. NICHOLAS, III, WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, HENRY SAMUELI and others
United States v. Randy Werst
as 08-3364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Randy Lee Werst
United States v. Randy Schell
as 08-3095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Randy Lee Schell
USA v. Cotton
as 08-50876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY LEE COTTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
